what_is_pair_programming
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
what_is_pair_programming [2016/06/20 14:09] – created hpsamios | what_is_pair_programming [2021/04/01 14:02] (current) – Changed pair typing to a quote hans | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== What is Pair Programming? | ====== What is Pair Programming? | ||
- | Or "what are the benefits of pair programming?" | + | > Or "what are the benefits of pair programming?" |
- | + | > Or "how should I get started with pair programming?" | |
- | Or "how should I get started with pair programming?" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ====== Basics ====== | + | |
I've recently has a number of discussions about the benefits of pair programming. Some of the thinking was that the main use of pair programming was as a learning tool, to help break down our specializations. This is the result of the emphasis we made in answering the question of breaking down specialization on a team (see [[how_do_we_get_all_the_work_addressed_when_our_specialists_cannot_be_everywhere|How Do We Get All the Work Addressed When Our Specialists Cannot Be Everywhere? | I've recently has a number of discussions about the benefits of pair programming. Some of the thinking was that the main use of pair programming was as a learning tool, to help break down our specializations. This is the result of the emphasis we made in answering the question of breaking down specialization on a team (see [[how_do_we_get_all_the_work_addressed_when_our_specialists_cannot_be_everywhere|How Do We Get All the Work Addressed When Our Specialists Cannot Be Everywhere? | ||
Line 28: | Line 25: | ||
Most developers I have worked are skeptical of the idea somehow this produces better results. The thinking is that if you have 2 people doing the work where 1 used to do, it must be less productive. The reality is that if development were just a matter of typing, then yes, having two people do the work of one does not make economic sense. But if you look at the way you develop, a lot of the time is actually spent thinking (this is knowledge work after all) and so there is expected benefit of working together to improve a result. In fact, you could take this idea to the extreme. There is a concept out there called “mob programming” one keyboard / mouse for the whole team, with one team member driving and everyone else navigating (see https:// | Most developers I have worked are skeptical of the idea somehow this produces better results. The thinking is that if you have 2 people doing the work where 1 used to do, it must be less productive. The reality is that if development were just a matter of typing, then yes, having two people do the work of one does not make economic sense. But if you look at the way you develop, a lot of the time is actually spent thinking (this is knowledge work after all) and so there is expected benefit of working together to improve a result. In fact, you could take this idea to the extreme. There is a concept out there called “mob programming” one keyboard / mouse for the whole team, with one team member driving and everyone else navigating (see https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bottom line concept: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > "Pair programming is pair ' | ||
====== Experiment ====== | ====== Experiment ====== |
/home/hpsamios/hanssamios.com/dokuwiki/data/attic/what_is_pair_programming.1466456967.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/06/02 14:31 (external edit)