Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- why_should_we_start_without_doing_a_complete_analysis [2020/06/04 09:05] – Removed LINKBACK hans
+++ why_should_we_start_without_doing_a_complete_analysis [2020/06/10 12:50] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation hans
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 Of course not.
-This is not to say that we don't do approval for work when we take on an agile approach. Of course we do. We just minimize the analysis based on what is realistically possible, then start working anything that gets through while using [[blog:how_can_we_understand_the_real_value_of_fast_feedback_and_deciding_late|fast feedback]] to adjust the course we are heading based on latest information. In particular, we end up making more smaller bets based on current information, perhaps releasing money every quarter instead of developing a "committed plan" for years in advance.
+This is not to say that we don't do approval for work when we take on an agile approach. Of course we do. We just minimize the analysis based on what is realistically possible, then start working anything that gets through while using [[how_can_we_understand_the_real_value_of_fast_feedback_and_deciding_late|fast feedback]] to adjust the course we are heading based on latest information. In particular, we end up making more smaller bets based on current information, perhaps releasing money every quarter instead of developing a "committed plan" for years in advance.
 And yes, I understand, this is a change in the thinking. It will probably mean you will have to get the finance people, the business people, and the marketing folks involved in the change in thinking process. But given the economic benefits that could result, isn't the change worth the effort?